With new federal ruling, will employers eliminate coverage for preventive services?

If a new ruling against the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is upheld, employers will have the choice to increase costs for some preventive services. The case, Braidwood v. Becerra, was overseen by U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor and calls for the government to immediately stop enforcing Affordable Care Act (ACA) rules that require health plans cover and waive cost-sharing for high-value preventive services, including screenings for cancer, diabetes, HIV, and mental health.

The consensus among experts is that it will take at least another year to see whether the courts will uphold the ruling. In the meantime, employers and other health care stakeholders are watching carefully for potential impacts. Paul Fronstin, director of health benefits research at the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) in Washington, D.C. suggests “I just don’t see employers backing off [paying for preventive care coverage] even if they are allowed to…Most employers recognize the value of covering high-value services…”  Time will tell whether employers agree.

News & Latest Posts

In NJ, ACA Compliance May Not Be Enough

July 30, 2026

For Applicable Large Employers [ALEs], complying with the Affordable Care Act (ACA)…

PFML: How To Align Federal & State Laws

July 24, 2026

Overlapping federal and state regulations for PFML [Paid Family and Medical Leave]…

Why PFML Needs An Ecosystem Solution

July 21, 2026

Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) is too complex and dynamic for…

PCORI Fees Due July 31. Download Our Employer Guide

July 9, 2026

PCORI fees are federal taxes mandated by the Affordable Care Act and…

PFML Complexities Demand Better Connected Data

June 17, 2026

When employers think about Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML), they typically…

Trump Accounts: What Employers Need to Know

July 8, 2026

Starting July 2026, employers can make voluntary, tax-free contributions of up to…